That’s the question asked by USA Today. The results may surprise you. One Florida firm, Collman & Karsky Architects of Tampa, has increased its staff by nearly a third since late 2004, trying to keep pace with surging demand for sleek new office, condo and retail buildings.
“The vacancy rate for office space is in the 10 percent range (or lower). As that approaches down to the 6 percent range, we’re going to be seeing more speculative office buildings,” says Rodney Collman, a principal at the firm. “We still have about 1,000 people a day moving into Florida. We’ve got a lot of housing needs.”
U.S. commercial real estate is surging after several down years, with is good news for the economy and firms like Collman’s. But it’s worrying federal officials, as banks are carrying a heavier concentration of real estate loans today than they did during a heady 1980s boom — which ended in a bust, forcing many lenders out of business.
In Georgia, commercial real estate loan concentration (a definition that includes housing activity) is at record levels, soaring from $7.5 billion and 40 percent of bank assets in 1996 to $34.5 billion and 61 percent in 2005, the FDIC says. In Florida, construction and development loans grew 66 percent in 2005.
Nationally, in the mid-1990s, 15-20 percent of federally insured banks carried what regulators consider a heavy load of commercial real estate loans. In 2005, it was 40 percent.
“For banks in the moderate-sized ranges and smaller, what we’re seeing is that the amount of capital committed to commercial real estate has basically more than doubled from the year 2000 and that these loans today represent three times capital. Back in the worst times of the ’80s, it was one-and-a-half times capital.” says Federal Reserve Gov. Susan Schmidt Bies, a former bank official.
TIGHTENING STANDARDS
Determined to avoid a reprise of the 1980s, regulators are tightening real estate lending standards. While such loans are generally performing well and bank profits are healthy, Bies and other officials warn that the industry is entering a time of trouble.
U.S. interest rates are rising and a wave of just-completed office, condo and other buildings are coming on the market, which could affect rents and prices. Lenders are fighting the efforts, particularly smaller banks that see real estate as one of their best chances to compete effectively with huge, national lenders.
“Community banks are saying, ‘If you take this line of business from us, you’re running the risk of essentially putting us out of business,’” said Mark Tenhundfeld, Director of the American Bankers Association Office of Regulatory Policy.
David H. Wells Jr., president and CEO of K Bank, a $650 million commercial bank in Owings Mills, Md., says the federal effort has already affected his business. He’s decided to hold back a bit due to uncertainty about the regulatory climate and signs of softening in the housing market.
“What they’ve done is to throw a bucket of cold water over the whole business. We’re certainly not going to get any more concentrated,” Wells said.
Industry analysts agree that banks are more cautious than two decades ago, but given the up-and-down nature of the real estate market, there’s no substitute for tighter regulation of portfolios.
“The concentration in real estate exposure in the industry has always been fairly high, but right now it’s at an all-time peak,” says Khanh Vuong, a senior financial analyst at AM Best, which rates the financial condition of insurers and, increasingly, banks. It issued a report calling concentration a powerful risk to bank earnings, saying that conditions are softening.
CONSTRUCTION PICKS UP
Commercial real estate slowed several years ago but has been roaring back. U.S. office vacancy rates, now the lowest since 2001, will average 11 percent by the end of 2006. That’s down from more than 14 percent in 2005. An estimated 31,000 hotel rooms are expected to be added in 52 markets studied in 2006, up from 3,852 in 2005, according to the National Association of Realtors.
“There’s been a sense that this has been a more disciplined real estate cycle, compared with 10 to 15 years ago,” said Robert Murray of McGraw-Hill Construction, who added that with a greater share of buildings pre-leased or sold, more office buildings are under construction, which is “starting to generate some concern.”
The American Institute of Architects said that billing is showing signs of activity expanding, which is thought of as a leading indicator. Changes in activity usually indicate in about nine months that either a slowdown or speedup in construction activity is coming.
“We’ve seen no signs so far that acceleration (in commercial real estate) is starting to wane,” says Kermit Baker, AIA chief economist.
Michael Sullivan of OWP&P Architects in Chicago says things are healthy, with some firms constructing new office buildings in the suburbs.
“I certainly have not heard that clients are having difficulty on the financing side,” he said.
Rents for commercial real estate have surged, according to Global Real Analytics. Warehouse rates in Las Vegas rose 13.7 percent from the first quarter of 2005 to the same period in 2006. Retail rents in Honolulu were up 13.4 percent and office rents in San Francisco’s central business district were up 12.5 percent.
However, Detroit and Cleveland are struggling, while some commercial real estate properties in Atlanta, Dallas and Chicago are lagging with rents, according to Global Real Analytics. Further, the Florida housing market and other hot markets are cooling, and there are fears about increased inventory in many of these areas.
Commercial real estate has been a support to community banks, which have been losing traditional business to big institutions. In 1985, community banks had 33.6 percent of consumer home loans, midsize banks had 49.8 percent, while the nation’s biggest 25 banks had 16.6 percent. By 2003, the community bank share was down to 11.6 percent and the midsize share 29 percent, while the big banks had 59.4 percent, the FDIC said.
“I wouldn’t describe it as alarming, I would describe it as a natural reaction” to a good economy and record housing market, says Steve Fritts, Director of Risk Management Policy at the FDIC Supervision and Consumer Protection Division. “But loans may be very good loans individually, but as (concentration) has grown, banks haven’t necessarily built up the management systems.”
TAKING RISK INTO ACCOUNT
Overbuilding can force down rents. Rising interest rates may make it more difficult to sell a property or complete a project. Foreign capital and pension funds chasing investment properties, along with banks competing for business, may push prices too high and erode lending standards.
The regulators’ guidance is intended to ensure that banks consider a range of factors as their real estate portfolios grow, taking account of the broader risks. The Fed, FDIC, Office of Thrift Supervision and Comptroller of the Currency want banks to implement risk management controls such as beefing up capital, if they have significant commercial loans.
Commercial real estate is defined as loans secured by land, development and construction, and loans on existing properties like apartments, retail and offices. They emphasize their focus is on the most volatile slice of the business: loans whose repayment depends on rental income, proceeds of a sale, or permanent financing or refinancing of the property.